Is the lopsided Universe telling us something?

The Universe is incredibly regular. The variation of the cosmos’ temperature across the entire sky is tiny: a few millionths of a degree, no matter which direction you look. Yet the same light from the very early cosmos that reveals the Universe’s evenness also tells astronomers a great deal about the conditions that gave rise to irregularities like stars, galaxies, and (incidentally) us.

That light is the cosmic microwave background, and it provides some of the best knowledge we have about the structure, content, and history of the Universe. But it also contains a few mysteries: on very large scales, the cosmos seems to have a certain lopsidedness. That slight asymmetry is reflected in temperature fluctuations much larger than any galaxy, aligned on the sky in a pattern facetiously dubbed “the axis of evil.”

The lopsidedness is real, but cosmologists are divided over whether it reveals anything meaningful about the fundamental laws of physics. The fluctuations are sufficiently small that they could arise from random chance. We have just one observable Universe, but nobody sensible believes we can see all of it. With a sufficiently large cosmos beyond the reach of our telescopes, the rest of the Universe may balance the oddity that we can see, making it a minor, local variation.

However, if the asymmetry can’t be explained away so simply, it could indicate that some new physical mechanisms were at work in the early history of the Universe. As Amanda Yoho, a graduate student in cosmology at Case Western Reserve University, told Ars, “I think the alignments, in conjunction with all of the other large angle anomalies, must point to something we don’t know, whether that be new fundamental physics, unknown astrophysical or cosmological sources, or something else.

via Is the lopsided Universe telling us we need new theories? | Ars Technica.

Posted in Cosmology, Dimensions, Evolution, Information, Space | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

We live forever in multiple biocentric universes

Once created, we exist forever, according to Dr. Robert Lanza in his new book, Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the Nature of the Universe. Submerging himself into physics, quantum mechanics and astrophysics, Lanza came to the conclusion that consciousness and life are basic to the universe. “The universe doesn’t create consciousness; consciousness creates the universe.”

Lanza says that some of the fundamentals of the universe, like intelligence, existed prior to matter. ”Time and space are merely tools of consciousness.” He says that we carry space and time around with us “like turtles with shells,” meaning that when the shell comes off (space and time), we still exist.

Lanza posits that there is no such thing as the death of consciousness. In fact, consciousness is separate from time and space. It exists anywhere and everywhere; in the human body and outside of it. In other words, it is non-local in the same sense that quantum objects are non-local.

He talks about multiple universes existing simultaneously. In one universe, the body can be dead, but in another, it continues to exist. This means that dead people traveling through the same tunnel end up, not in hell or in heaven, but in a similar world they once inhabited, but this time they’re alive and this goes on infinitely.

via We live forever in multiple biocentric universes – Nashville Religion & Spirituality | Examiner.com.

Posted in Cosmology, Dimensions, Evolution, Information, Religion, Science, Space, Thoughts | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Collision with Another Universe

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the left-over heat from the Big Bang. This radiation provides a picture of the universe when it was only 400,000 years old. Now, 14 billion years later, it has cooled to microwave frequencies and is nearly uniform. The slight variations of 1 part in 100,000 in its temperature reflect initial inhomogeneities in the matter and radiation that later collapsed to form clusters and galaxies. These fluctuations carry information about the origin, composition and evolution of the universe, and theories of the origin of the universe make detailed predictions about their statistical properties.

The CMB is our best hope of uncovering fingerprints of the physics operating at very high-energy scales, inaccessible to Earth-bound particle accelerators. Current cosmological data are, for the first time, precise enough to allow detailed tests of models of the very early universe. The Planck satellite has then dramatically sharpened our view of the early universe, and provided a window into the origin of cosmic structure.

A primordial collision of our Universe with an Exo-Universe would leave a unique imprint in the cosmic microwave background. Physicists in Canada and the US now claim that the prediction can be tested using existing and future space telescopes, contradicting the standard view that the existence of a multiverse is untestable.

via A Collision with Another Universe –Are Signs Lurking in the Big Bang Afterglow?.

Posted in Cosmology, Dimensions, Evolution, Information, Science, Space | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Major problem

Washington: Scientists have solved a major problem with the current standard model of cosmology by combining results from the Planck spacecraft and measurements of gravitational lensing in order to deduce the mass of ghostly sub-atomic particles called neutrinos.

The team, from the universities of Manchester and Nottingham, used observations of the Big Bang and the curvature of space-time to accurately measure the mass of these elementary particles for the first time.

The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is the oldest light in the universe, and its study has allowed scientists to accurately measure cosmological parameters, such as the amount of matter in the universe and its age.

But an inconsistency arises when large-scale structures of the universe, like the distribution of galaxies, are observed.

Professor Richard Battye, from the University of Manchester’s School of Physics and Astronomy, said that they observe fewer galaxy clusters than they would expect from the Planck results and there is a weaker signal from gravitational lensing of galaxies than the CMB would suggest.

Professor Battye and co-author Dr. Adam Moss, from the University of Nottingham, combined the data from Planck with gravitational lensing observations in which images of galaxies are warped by the curvature of space-time, and concluded that the current discrepancies can be resolved if massive neutrinos are included in the standard cosmological model.

They estimate that the sum of masses of neutrinos is 0.320 +/- 0.081 eV (assuming active neutrinos with three flavors).

The paper has been published in Physical Review Letters.

via Major problem with current standard model of cosmology resolved.

Posted in Cosmology, Evolution, Information, Science, Space | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment